Your resume is the only codebase nobody ever reviews.
Senior engineers ship systems that scale to millions. Then they describe themselves as "results-driven professionals." We fix that.
Impact is not a verb. metric.
Led cross-functional teams to improve platform reliability and reduce customer-facing incidents through better monitoring and on-call processes.
Reduced P0 incident rate 73% (4.2h → 18min MTTR) by redesigning on-call rotation and instrumenting 4 microservices with distributed tracing across 3 teams.
average callback rate increase after quantification
"Collaborated with stakeholders" hired nobody.
Collaborated with product, design, and engineering stakeholders to align roadmap priorities and ensure successful delivery of key platform features.
Negotiated scope reduction on 3 roadmap items with CPO, unblocking a 6-engineer team and shipping the payments API 5 weeks ahead of a $2.4M contract deadline.
of ghosted applications contain passive-verb bullets
Your GitHub has more narrative than your resume. Fix that.
Proficient in Python, Go, AWS (EC2, RDS, S3, Lambda), Kubernetes, Terraform. Experience with CI/CD pipelines and agile methodologies.
Migrated 14-service monolith to Kubernetes on AWS EKS, cutting infrastructure cost 41% ($180K/yr) and enabling zero-downtime deploys via Argo CD across 3 environments.
more interviews from skills-in-context vs. skills-list format
Two pages cannot hold fifteen years. Unless you edit like an engineer.
Senior Software Engineer at DataCorp (2018–2021): Worked on backend systems, participated in architecture reviews, mentored junior engineers, contributed to platform reliability initiatives and internal tooling projects.
Designed event-sourced order system (Kafka + Postgres) handling 340K txn/day at DataCorp; mentored 4 engineers to senior level; led 18-month SOC2 Type II certification that unblocked enterprise sales.
of staff-level resumes bury their highest-signal work below the fold
Anonymized A/B data from 847 rewrites across FAANG, Series B, and defense.
We track callback rate, ATS parse score, and time-to-offer for every client. These are the aggregate results. Names and companies are redacted at client request.
Quantified bullets vs. verb-led bullets
Architecture context vs. skills list
Reframe resume vs. original
Clients who received written recruiter feedback forwarded it to us. Names, companies, and identifying details are redacted.
"Went from 0 responses in 6 months to 4 first-round interviews in 3 weeks. The rewrite surfaced work I had literally forgotten to mention."
"Every recruiter who called said the same thing: "Your experience mapping to our metrics stood out immediately." That language was not in my original resume."
"I had been applying for 8 months. After the rewrite I had a cleared position offer within 5 weeks. The security clearance context was something I would never have known to include."
The six-second scan is not a metaphor.
Ladders Inc. eye-tracking research across 30 recruiters found that hiring managers spend a median of 6.2 seconds on initial resume review. They scan: current title, current company, previous title, previous company, start/end dates, education. In that order. Everything else is secondary. We structure your resume around what they actually look at first.
Find out how your resume actually scores.
Paste your LinkedIn URL. Our system analyzes your profile against the same rubric we use for full rewrites — quantification density, ATS keyword coverage, verb strength, and information hierarchy. You get a score and a breakdown in under 60 seconds. No signup. No pitch.
Reserve your rewrite.
We open 20 spots per month. Every rewrite is done by a human editor with FAANG recruiting experience — not a template generator.
Current wait: 3 weeks.